HOME | Arts | Health | Language Arts | Math/Science | Social Studies | World Languages | Glossary
Samples of assessment instruments used in classrooms follow. They are examples only and are not intended to be exhaustive. They may be used or adapted in your program.
General Communication Scoring Guide
Scoring Guide for an Interview
Peer Evaluation of an Oral Presentation
Checklist for Planning an Immersion Program
Checklist to Evaluate Textbooks, Activities, and Materials
Scoring guides, or rubrics, have been developed to provide consistency of scoring of student performance.
adapted from
Second Language Elementary, Oregon Department of Education, February, 1995
|
|
Message is |
Delivery is |
Information |
Language Structure |
Pronunciation |
Vocabulary |
|||||
|
6 |
easily understood in its entirety |
effortless and smooth |
expands on all relevant information |
employs complex structures and speech; demonstrates a sophistication beyond that which has been studied |
approximates native speech |
is used accurately with creative variety |
|||||
|
5 |
comprehensible in its entirety with a few minor flaws |
has no unnatural pauses; sounds like natural speech |
includes all relevant information |
employees consistent and accurate use of structures; .may contain a few minor errors that don't interfere with the communication |
is mostly correct with only minor flaws |
is varied and accurate |
|||||
|
4 |
generally comprehensible |
fairly smooth with a few unnatural pauses; slight choppiness and/or occasional error in information |
includes most relevant information |
generally uses correct structures with some errors |
influenced by first language |
is appropriate |
|||||
|
3 |
somewhat comprehensible |
occasionally halting and fragmentary with some unnatural pauses, choppiness, or inappropriate intonation |
includes a fair amount of relevant information; may include contradictions, informational gaps, or redundancies |
demonstrates an inconsistent use of correct structures |
shows strong influence from first language |
is simple with some inappropriate use |
|||||
|
2 |
difficult to understand |
very halting and fragmentary with many unnatural pauses; speech sounds mechanical |
little relevant information is presented |
shows many errors in use of structure |
is dominated by first language |
is limited or incorrect |
|||||
|
1 |
incomprehensible |
very halting and fragmentary with excessive unnatural pauses |
vague or confusing information is presented |
has no apparent understanding of structures |
interferes with comprehension |
is very poor or inaccurate for topic; first language words may be used; speaker may create a target language form from first language |
|||||
adapted from
Second Language Elementary, Oregon Department of Education, February, 1995
|
Interview Scoring Guide |
||||||
|
|
Questions and Answers |
Word Order and Intonation |
Delivery |
Language Structure |
Pronunciation/ Intonation |
Vocabulary |
|
6 |
are elaborate and varied; tailored to previous responses (employs some circumlocation) |
are correct and fluent |
is effortless and smooth |
employs complex structures and speech; demonstrates a sophistication beyond that which has been studied |
approximates native speech |
is used accurately with creative variety; reveals breadth of knowledge |
|
5 |
are varied |
are correct |
has no unnatural pauses |
employs consistent and accurate use of structures; may contain a few minor errors that don't interfere with the communication |
is mostly correct with only minor flaws |
is varied and accurate |
|
4 |
are basic |
are mostly correct |
is fairly smooth with few unnatural pauses; slight choppiness and/or occasional error in intonation |
generally uses correct structures with some errors |
is influenced by first language |
is appropriate |
|
3 |
are simplistic or inappropriate |
are influenced by first language |
is halting and fragmentary with some unnatural pauses |
demonstrates an inconsistent use of correct structure |
shows strong influence from first language |
is simple with some inappropriate use |
|
2 |
are very simplistic or inappropriate |
are heavily influenced by first language |
is halting and fragmentary with many unnatural pauses |
shows many errors in use of structure |
is dominated by first language |
is limited or incorrect |
|
1 |
are minimal and may be inappropriate (yes/no type; one-word response) |
are inappropriate |
is halting and fragmentary with excessive unnatural pauses |
has no apparent understanding of structures |
interferes with comprehension |
is very poor or inaccurate for topic; first language words may be used; speaker may create a target language from first language |
adapted from
Second Language Elementary, Oregon Department of Education, February, 1995
|
Narration Scoring Guide |
||||||
|
|
Organization of Story |
Details |
Delivery |
Language Structure |
Pronunciation/ Intonation |
Vocabulary |
|
6 |
story has creative or unusual beginning, middle, and end; sequencing is highly evident with excellent use of transitions |
rich use of details or specifics |
effortless and smooth |
employs complex structures and speech; demonstrates a sophistication beyond that which has been studied |
approximates native speech |
is used accurately with creative variety; reveals breadth of knowledge |
|
5 |
story has well developed beginning, middle, and end; sequencing is evident with good use of transitions |
use of many details or specifics |
no unnatural pauses; sounds like natural speech |
employs consistent and accurate use of structures; may contain a few minor errors that don't interfere with the communication |
is mostly correct with only minor flaws |
is varied and accurate |
|
4 |
story has adequate beginning, middle, and end, but may be unclear; sequencing is simple with few transitions |
some use of details or specifics |
fairly smooth with few unnatural pauses; slight choppiness and/or occasional error in intonation |
generally uses correct structures with some errors |
is influenced by first language |
is appropriate |
|
3 |
story has beginning, middle, and end, but may be unclear; sequencing is very simple with few transitions |
few details or specifics included |
occasionally halting and fragmentary with some unnatural pauses, choppiness, or inappropriate intonation |
demonstrates an inconsistent use of correct structure |
shows strong influence from first language |
is simple with some inappropriate use |
|
2 |
story is sketchy; sequence is difficult to follow |
audience is left with many questions |
halting and fragmentary with many unnatural pauses; speech sounds mechanical |
shows many errors in use of structure |
is dominated by first language |
is limited or incorrect |
|
1 |
story is incomprehensible |
no evidence of unfolding of significant events |
very halting and fragmentary with excessive unnatural pauses |
has no apparent understanding of structures |
interferes with comprehension |
is very poor or inaccurate for topic; first language word may be used; speaker may create a target language from first language |
adapted from
Second Language Elementary, Oregon Department of Education, February, 1995
|
Skit Scoring Guide |
||||||
|
|
Developing and Sequencing |
Cultural Behaviors |
Delivery |
Language Structure |
Pronunciation/ Intonation |
Vocabulary |
|
6 |
creatively developed in detail; entertaining; rich, unusual story elements |
exhibits obvious and subtle target cultural behaviors |
effortless and smooth |
employs complex structures and speech; demonstrates a sophistication beyond that which has been studied |
approximates native speech |
is used accurately with creative variety; reveals breadth of knowledge |
|
5 |
well developed; many details; holds audience's interest; strong beginning, middle, and end |
exhibits many appropriate target cultural behaviors |
no unnatural pauses; sounds like natural speech |
employs consistent and accurate use of structures; may contain a few minor errors that don't interfere with the communication |
is mostly correct with only minor flaws |
is varied and accurate |
|
4 |
adequately developed; includes all required story elements; has beginning, middle, and end |
exhibits some target cultural behaviors |
fairly smooth with few unnatural pauses; slight choppiness and/or occasional error in intonation |
generally uses correct structures with some errors |
is influenced by first language |
is appropriate |
|
3 |
partially developed; missing a few required story elements; beginning, middle, and end may be unclear |
exhibits only the most obvious target cultural behaviors |
occasionally halting and fragmentary with some unnatural pauses, choppiness, or inappropriate intonation |
demonstrates an inconsistent use of correct structure |
shows strong influence from first language |
is simple with some inappropriate use |
|
2 |
minimal development; missing many required story elements; hard to follow |
exhibits little target cultural behavior |
halting and fragmentary with many unnatural pauses; speech sounds mechanical |
shows many errors in use of structure |
is dominated by first language |
is limited or incorrect |
|
1 |
unsatisfactory development; inadequate amount of material; no sequencing |
exhibits no target cultural behaviors |
very halting and fragmentary with excessive unnatural pauses |
has no apparent understanding of structures |
interferes with comprehension |
is very poor or inaccurate for topic; first language word may be used; speaker may create a target language from first language |
adapted from
Second Language Elementary, Oregon Department of Education, February, 1995|
Peer Evaluation of an Oral Presentation |
|||
|
|
Very Good 3 |
Satisfactory 2 |
Poor 1 |
|
Gave an interesting introduction |
|
|
|
|
Presented clear explanation of topic |
|
|
|
|
Presented information in acceptable order |
|
|
|
|
Used complete sentences |
|
|
|
|
Offered a concluding summary |
|
|
|
|
Spoke clearly, correctly, distinctly, and confidently |
|
|
|
|
Maintained eye contact |
|
|
|
|
Maintained acceptable posture |
|
|
|
|
Presentation was interesting |
|
|
|
|
Used visual/audio aids well |
|
|
|
|
Handled questions and comments from the class very well |
|
|
|
Total ___________ (of 33) |
|||
Teacher Resource Manual, Senior High Social Studies 10/20/30, Alberta , 1990
|
Group Performance Rating Scale |
|||||
|
Directions: Use this form to give feedback about the performance in your group. Circle the appropriate number after each statement. 0 = Major Difficulty, 1 = Needs Improvement, 2 = Okay, 3 = Very Good, 4 = Excellent |
|||||
|
1. All members participated in the group activities. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
2. Members listened to others in the group. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
3. Members helped and encouraged others in the group. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
4. Group members stayed on the task assigned. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
5. Group members worked well together. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
6. No one dominated the group discussions. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
7. Group members practiced the cooperative skills. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
8. Group members did not use put-downs. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
9. Group members were able to accept criticism. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
10. Trust developed among group members. |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
Add all circled numbers for Total Score ___________ (out of 40) |
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
adapted from Alan C. King, Skills for Healthy Relationships, CMEC, 1993.
|
Group Project Likert Scale |
|||||||||||||||
|
A likert scale is used to evaluate a product or demonstration by selecting a number from highest to lowest (e.g., 1-5) for each specified trait. The numbers are arranged horizontally and are added up to arrive at an overall score. Directions: For each of the following criteria, place the most appropriate number or letter to evaluate your peer's actions in group project. Group may be evaluated as a whole or as individuals. |
|||||||||||||||
|
Excellent 5 |
Good 4 |
Satisfactory 3 |
Fair 2 |
Poor 1 |
|||||||||||
|
or A: Always, S: Sometimes, N: Never |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Teacher Resource Manual, Senior High Social Studies 10/20/30, Alberta, 1990
|
Dramatic Reader Score Sheet Directions: For each quality listed below, circle the number that most nearly describes the position of this paper on the following scale from high to low. |
|||||||||||||
|
LANGUAGE FACTORS |
HIGH |
MEDIUM |
LOW |
||||||||||
I.1. Conversation - Realism |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
||||||||
I.2. Conversation - Situation |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
||||||||
I.3. Stage Directions |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
||||||||
TOTAL LANGUAGE SCORE |
|||||||||||||
|
SHAPE FACTORS |
HIGH |
MEDIUM |
LOW |
||||||||||
II.1. Beginning |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
||||||||
II.2. Structure |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
||||||||
II.3. Ending |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
||||||||
|
TOTAL SHAPE SCORE |
|||||||||||||
|
CHARACTERIZATION FACTORS |
HIGH |
MEDIUM |
LOW |
||||||||||
III.1. Development |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
||||||||
III.2. Consistency |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
||||||||
|
TOTAL CHARACTERIZATION SCORE |
|||||||||||||
|
MECHANICS FACTORS |
HIGH |
MEDIUM |
LOW |
||||||||||
IV.1. Dramatic Form |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
||||||||
IV.2. Spelling |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
||||||||
IV.3. Punctuation |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
||||||||
|
TOTAL MECHANICS SCORE |
|||||||||||||
|
RESPONSE FACTORS |
HIGH |
MEDIUM |
LOW |
||||||||||
V.1 Entertainment |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
||||||||
V.2 Originality |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
||||||||
|
TOTAL RESPONSE SCORE__________
TOTAL SCORE |
|||||||||||||
Cooper and Odell,
Evaluating Writing, Describing, Measuring, Judging, NCTE, p.29, 1977
|
Profile of a Bilingual Child 199_ - 199_ Child's Name ________________________________ Grade Level _________________________
District ___________________ School ______________________Teacher ____________________
First Language (L1) ______________ Second Language (L2) ________________ Date _________
|
||||||||||
|
Curriculum/Assessment Areas |
Does Not Meet Standards |
Meets Standards |
Exceeds Standards |
|||||||
|
Oral Language |
L1 |
L2 |
L1 |
L2 |
L1 |
L2 |
||||
|
Written Language |
L1 |
L2 |
L1 |
L2 |
L1 |
L2 |
||||
|
Reading |
L1 |
L2 |
L1 |
L2 |
L1 |
L2 |
||||
|
Overall Profile Summary |
L1 |
L2 |
L1 |
L2 |
L1 |
L2 |
||||
|
Pieces of Evidence for Curriculum/Assessment Areas |
||||||||||
|
Curriculum/ Assessment Areas |
L1 |
Date Completed |
L2 |
Date Completed |
||||||
|
I. Oral Language |
1.1____________ 1.2____________ 1.3____________ 1.4____________
|
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
|
1.10___________ 1.20___________ 1.30___________ 1.40___________
|
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
|
||||||
|
II. Written Language |
2.1___________ 2.2___________ 2.3___________ 2.4___________
|
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
|
2.10___________ 2.20___________ 2.30___________ 2.40___________
|
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
|
||||||
|
III. Reading |
3.1___________ 3.2___________ 3.3___________ 3.4___________
|
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
|
3.10___________ 3.20___________ 3.30___________ 3.40___________
|
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
|
||||||
draft by
Margo Gottlieb, Illinois Resource Center, 1855 Mt. Prospect Road, Des Plaines, IL 60018
CHECKLISTS
|
Writing Conference Checklist |
|||||||||||||||
|
student's name
Title of work
|
Date |
Ideas (Focus/ Thesis) |
Organization |
Vocabulary |
Sentence Structure |
Voice |
Mechanics |
Comments |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Symbol explanations: + well developed; v satisfactory;- needs attention; NA not applicable |
|||||||||||||||
|
ü |
Checklist for Planning an Immersion Program |
Comments |
||
|
|
core group of parents and district staff established |
|
||
|
|
facts gathered |
|
||
|
|
sufficient parent interest established |
|
||
|
|
target language selected |
|
||
|
|
realistic program goals established |
|
||
|
|
program type and scope determined |
|
||
|
|
action plan and timetable developed |
|
||
|
|
budget prepared |
|
||
|
|
public relations campaign planned |
|
||
|
|
public relations campaign underway |
|
||
|
|
program submitted for district approval |
|
||
adapted from
Challenges and Opportunities: Immersion Education in San Francisco
|
Reading Conference Checklist |
|||||||||||
|
Student_____________________________________________________ |
|||||||||||
|
|
Date: |
Date: |
Date: |
Date: |
Date: |
Date: |
|||||
|
|
Title: |
Title: |
Title: |
Title: |
Title: |
Title: |
|||||
|
Level Appropriate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Reads fluently |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
With inflection |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Literal comprehension |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Interpretive comprehension |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Strategies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Whole idea |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Picture clues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Pattern |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Sight words |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
First letter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Decodes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Context clues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Skip-return |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Rereads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
CODES: + Consistently, X Sometimes |
|||||||||||
adapted from Christopher-Gordon Publishers, 1994
|
ü |
Checklist to Evaluate Textbooks, Activities, and Materials |
|
|
contains student activities that are proficiency-based |
|
|
appeals to a variety of learning styles |
|
|
actively engages students in meaningful, interactive communication |
|
|
allows for open-ended and creative uses of language |
|
|
requires higher order thinking skills |
|
|
occurs within a cultural context |
|
|
promotes the use of language functions |
|
|
supports the spiraling process of language acquisition |
|
|
grammar explanations are clear and concise, enabling students to work toward accuracy goals from the beginning of the instructional sequence |
|
|
cultural information integrates throughout the text |
|
|
cultural information is current |
|
|
cultural information reflects the diversity within that culture |
|
|
all materials include visuals of both genders, varied ages, and are representative of ethnic, racial, and cultural diversity |
|
|
interdisciplinary connections are apparent in the materials |
adapted from
Second Language Elementary, Oregon Department of Education, February, 1995
|
Summary of a Bilingual Child's Portfolio: Developmental Criteria
CHECK THE CRITERIA THAT APPLY TO THE CHILD'S PERFORMANCE IN THE FIRST (L1) AND SECOND (L2) LANGUAGE AS DEMONSTRATED IN THE PORTFOLIO AND MARK THE PORTFOLIO'S OVERALL DEVELOPMENT. Overall Development: |
||||||||
|
L1 |
L2 |
L1 |
L2 |
L1 |
L2 |
|||
|
¨ |
Does Not Meet Standards |
¨ |
¨ |
Meets Standards |
¨ |
¨ |
Exceeds Standards |
¨ |
|
Criteria |
||||||||
|
____ |
demonstrates little creativity, versatility and imagination |
____ |
____ |
demonstrates considerable creativity, versatility and imagination |
____ |
____ |
demonstrates wide-range creativity, versatility and imagination |
____ |
|
____ |
exhibits few reasoning strategies |
____ |
____ |
exhibits a variety of reasoning strategies |
____ |
____ |
exhibits a full repertoire of reasoning strategies |
____ |
|
____ |
links skills/ideas/concepts loosely together |
____ |
____ |
links skills/ideas/concepts and forms meaningful patterns |
____ |
____ |
integrates knowledge and applies it to new situations |
____ |
|
____ |
reflects negative attitude toward learning |
____ |
____ |
reflects neutral attitude toward learning |
____ |
____ |
reflects positive attitude toward learning |
____ |
|
____ |
reveals intermittent interest in interacting with environment |
____ |
____ |
reveals sustained interest in interacting with environment |
____ |
____ |
reveals sophistication in interacting with environment |
____ |
|
____ |
appears overwhelmed and frustrated by problems |
____ |
____ |
seeks immediate solutions to problems |
____ |
____ |
wrestles with problems and enjoys the challenge |
____ |
|
____ |
engages in scattered attempts of self-reflection under guidance |
____ |
____ |
engages in self-reflection and analysis of learning under guidance |
____ |
____ |
engages in self-reflection and analysis of learning |
____ |
|
____ |
communicates little progress and limited growth |
____ |
____ |
communicates relative progress and sporadic growth |
____ |
____ |
communicates clear progress and consistent growth |
____ |
|
____ |
involves parents in the learning process only when required to do so |
____ |
____ |
involves parents in the learning process to a limited extent |
____ |
____ |
involves parents in the learning process to a great extent |
____ |
Eric Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics
K-8 Foreign Language Assessment: a Bibliography Compiled by Lynn Thompson
|
Student Self Assessment of Foreign Language Performance Grade_______ Male _______ Female_______ Read the descriptions of tasks that you can do as a result of completing level 1. |
||||
|
Description Language_______________________ I can do the following: |
Yes (no assistance ) |
Yes (with assistance) |
No |
Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
15. Which of the above descriptions are you willing to demonstrate? List in priority order. _____________________ _____________________ ______________________
|
||||
Eric Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics
K-8 Foreign Language Assessment: a Bibliography Compiled by Lynn Thompson Prince George's County (MD) Public Schools Foreign Language Office
Questioning Techniques
Anecdotal Records
Anecdotal records offer opportunities to document students' growth over time. On-the-spot recording provides an inexpensive, non-threatening, assessable method of gathering a range of information about not only academic development, but also social and emotional development. Regular anecdotal recordings offer glimpses of progress and patterns of behavior not necessarily captured by other means of assessment. For example, in the inclusive classroom, students willingness to ask for help can be captured on daily anecdotal records. Similarly, through the use of anecdotal recordings, attention can be given to such student attributes as paying attention, time on task, effort, and organizational skills. This information, recorded over time, can reveal areas of instruction needing attention.
Alaska Social Studies Framework Draft, 10/6/96
|
Anecdotal Notes: Summary of Individual Retelling I = included N = not included NT = not included in the book |
|||||||||||||
|
Date |
Story |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments |
|
9/15 |
Mr. Floop's Lunch Oral Unguided Read to student |
N |
I |
I |
5/5 |
N |
4/6 |
N |
N |
I |
N |
N |
Student includes main character, supporting characters, some episodes, and ending. Setting refers to place. Needs sequence and details for reader to follow story. Must include problem and resolution. |
Adapted from
Wei Ling Wu, Rider College Reading/Language Arts, 1993
