HOME | Arts | Health | Language Arts | Math/Science | Social Studies | World Languages | Glossary

Alaska Department of Education & Early Development

FORMULATING MODELS


Models which aid in an understanding of the social studies can include:

 

 






INTERVIEWS/SURVEYS/POLLS

INTERVIEWS

Interviewing allows for first-hand data collection. Students in first grade can practice interviewing skills by asking their classmates questions about their birthdays. Students ask questions and then use data collected from the interviewee to create a greeting for the birthday child. The teacher records the data in a word bank to share with the child's family.

Another example of interviewing involves middle school students interviewing someone about their work in a profession they would like to enter about their work. This type of interviewing is helpful as students begin to make decisions about where to live, work, travel, and seek new opportunities (Geography Standard 2).

SURVEY

Technology can aid in conducting surveys beyond the boundaries of the local area. Students in Cold Bay used the following survey to collect data about cost of living in communities in their AT&T learning circle.

INDIVIDUAL SCHOOL/COMMUNITY DATA TALLY SHEET

SCHOOL NAME:______________________

LOCATION:_________________________

For each of the items listed below, please answer the questions below the list.

A

B

C

D

  1. Music Compact Disc

  1. Disposable Diapers

  1. Daily Newspaper

  1. Roses

  1. Flour, 5 lb/2 kg

  1. Fresh Eggs

  1. Coffee 2 lb/1 kg

  1. Fresh Salmon 2 lb/1 kg

  1. Carbonated Beverage 1 liter (e.g. coke)

  1. Electricity per KWH

Questions:

A. Can you buy this item in your community?

B. How much does it cost (in U.S. dollars)?

C. What does it cost before any taxes (local, provisional, or national) are assessed?

D. From where does the item come (what country or region of your country)?

Source: Clawson, Linn. The Cost of Living: The Effect of Geography on Living Costs. 1994.

POLLS

Polls can be used to collect data within the community and provide ways, as in this example, for students to conduct experimental inquiry.

Conduct a poll in your group about who should win the election for President of the United States. Based on the findings from your group, make a prediction about how people in the community feel about the presidency. Then conduct interviews in the community about who should win. Report on the selection of your group and the findings based on the interviews from the community. Make sure you relate the findings from the community with your original prediction.


Source: Marzano, et al, 1992.

ORAL HISTORY

Dorothy Orbison of Sitka has worked extensively with oral history in the classroom. She outlines a process for working with students who are interviewing members of the World War II generation. (The following is reproduced with the permission of Dorothy Orbison.)

General Background Knowledge


  1. Inventory prior knowledge about community history (what do we already know).
  2. Narrow focus to "living history" (within the life span of a living person) and class generates initial timeline.
  3. Small groups browse reference materials and guest speakers present overview of recent community history.
  4. Class revises timeline.
  5. Individuals, then small groups, and finally the whole class generates brainstormed list of potential topics for the oral history interviews and resulting publication.
  6. Students vote for a topic and then brainstorm sources of information about this topic (print, photo, video, and especially names of people in the community who could help us out).

 

Focus Background Preparation


  1. Repeat the process with narrower focus. Inventory prior knowledge.
  2. Access print and video resources to bolster background knowledge and invite a few guest speakers to share more specific information about the selected topic.
  3. Individuals, then small groups, and finally the whole class generates brainstormed list of general interview questions.
  4. Use historical photos to elicit a broader range of questions.
  5. Form interview teams. Pair teams with an elder. Teams learn what they can about their elder in advance, often by asking their parents and/or teachers. Teams compile lists of interview questions.

Interview and Writing Process


  1. First visit with elders. Hold off on the hard-core interrogation and focus on getting acquainted and building trust. Direct students to share information about themselves with elders.
  2. Teams modify and personalize lists of questions, adapting them to their particular elder.
  3. The second visit is the focused interview. Teams share questioning and note taking duties and may tape record only if elder agrees.
  4. Teams word process first drafts, write thank you notes, and write extension questions based on their first drafts.
  5. The third visit if for students to read the first draft to their elder, seeking corrections and expansion of information.
  6. Teams revise first drafts and write thank you notes.
  7. The fourth visit if for students to share the second draft with their elder, seeking last-chance corrections of information and to select photos to include in the book.
  8. Teams finalize their "perfect draft", write scripts, and practice brief speeches introducing, honoring, and thanking their elder.
  9. All students and elders gather for refreshments, speeches, and gift-giving (autographed copies of their "perfect draft" are presented to each elder.
  10. Student layout editors import text of interviews into computer publishing program, lay out the book, and send to printers with photos.

 

RESEARCH

Research in the social studies can take a variety of forms, as illustrated by the examples that follow. Problem-solving is integral to research and conclusions should be directly related back to an original hypothesis.

Students work in pairs over a one-week period. They present their data in a chart and summarize their conclusions in a written report.

Geographers tell us that the earth has more water than land. Conduct your own experiment using a globe to determine how much of the earth is water and how much is land. First, make a guess by simply looking at the globe. Then, spin the globe and have your partner point to a spot on the globe without looking. Did you point to water or land. Keep doing this and record your results in a chart. How were your results converted to fractions? Do your results support the estimate? Explain.


Students work in cooperative groups for three to four weeks, depending on accessibility of museums, libraries, etc.


Historians and archaeologists work as detectives by drawing conclusions from evidence they find to try and reconstruct the past. Select several artifacts from a specific period in history (primary sources only) and, using only those artifacts, draw your own conclusions and describe how you came to them. Along with an oral report, you should use a dramatic presentation or a videotaped enactment of your conclusions about the society

Source: Marzano, et al, 1992.

ROLE-PLAY

"Role-play allows students the opportunity to portray real-world situations. This requires students to use reasoning and problem-solving to deal with the reality of the experience as it unfolds." (Kentucky Frameworks) An example of role-playing is provided in the vignette on page ??? describing "The Last Wild Place on Planet Earth." Role-playing can also be designed around current, real-world leaders and issues. For example, students might role-play the G-7 leaders meeting at a summit to discuss economic issues or Native, governmental, business, environmental, and community leaders meeting to decide the fate of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

SIMULATIONS

Mock trials are an especially effective type of simulation for the social studies, specifically in relation to Government/Citizenship Standard 2: All Alaska students will understand the constitutional foundations of the American political system and the democratic ideals of our nation and its Key Element 8: understand the place of law in the American political system. Topics can originate from either historical, citizenship, or geographic situations. For example:

 

Mock trials can become an assessment centerpiece for a social studies program. This technique is utilized at Mt. Edgecumbe High School in Sitka where Don Surgeon guides students through a series of mock trials over the four years of high school. Students work closely with the magistrate and with local lawyers when preparing their cases.

In the ninth grade, students read the novel To Kill A Mockingbird and use the actual trial questions and closing arguments from the book as a the basis for a mock trial. Students then write and rewrite questions, opening, and closing arguments. The trial is also moved in time and location to current year and local community in order to add to the dilemma. Students are also able to access prior years' mock trials and to observe other mock trials (senior trial discussed below) before putting on this mock trial.

In the eleventh grade, students use the national competition mock trial. Topics in recent years have included a drug case involving a car search, drunk driving, battered women's syndrome, and educational malpractice.

In the twelfth grade, students create their own mock trial, from deciding the topic to writing all questions, opening, and closing statements, and generating evidence. The trials designed by the students have centered around abortion (with the male's role in the decision and paternity being central to the case), date rape, fetal alcohol syndrome and fetal alcohol effects, and police brutality, among others.

DESIGNING PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS AND SCORING RUBRICS

Components of performance assessments include the (1) performance task, (2) a response format, and (3) a scoring system.

 

Steps in Developing Performance Assessments

In an ideal setting, performance assessments can be developed by a development team of teachers, subject matter educators, subject matter professors, and assessment specialists (Shavelson, 1994); however, in the school setting, teachers may work alone or on grade level or interdisciplinary teams to develop performance assessments. In any case, what follows are some suggested steps for developing performance assessments. These are adapted from work by the Connecticut Department of Education.


Source: Stenmark, 1991.

One strong recommendation that comes from classroom educator who has worked with assessment over a period of several years is to pace yourself when developing new assessments. Teachers should remember that translating all assessment to alternative means does not mean that a whole year's worth of alternative assessments are not done at once, or even during the course of one year. Designing quality assessment pieces is not quick and easy. Develop one idea, become comfortable with it, and then move on. What this means is that, in reality, teachers should plan on designing an assessment or assessments for one unit each year. This is especially true for when working with a team of teachers and allowing time for thoughtful discussion during all phases from design, to implementation, to piloting, and to revision.



Criteria for Performance Tasks

In addition to a pilot test with small groups of students and with an entire class, good performance task can be evaluated according to the following criteria.

Essential

    ¨ The task fist into the core of the curriculum.

    ¨ It represents the big idea.

vs.

Tangential

    ¨ divergent

    ¨ incidental

    ¨ peripheral

Authentic

    ¨ The task uses processes appropriate to the discipline.

    ¨ Students value the outcome of the task.

vs.

Contrived

    ¨ devised

    ¨ invented

    ¨ made up

Rich

    ¨ The task leads to others.

    ¨ It raises other questions.

    ¨ It has many possibilities.

vs.

Superficial

    ¨ shallow

    ¨ cursory

    ¨ one-dimensional

Engaging

    ¨ The task is thought-provoking.

    ¨ It fosters persistence.

vs.

Uninteresting

Active

    ¨ The student is the worker and the decision-maker.

    ¨ Students interact with other students.

    ¨ Students are constructing meaning and deepening understanding.

vs.

Passive

    ¨ inactive

    ¨ quiet

    ¨ idle

Feasible

    ¨ The task can be done within school and homework time.

    ¨ It is developmentally appropriate for students.

    ¨ It is safe.

vs.

Infeasible

    ¨ impractical

    ¨ unworkable

    ¨ unattainable

Equitable

    ¨ The task develops thinking in a variety of styles.

    ¨ It contributes to positive attitudes.

vs.

Inequitable

    ¨ unfair

    ¨ unjust

    ¨ arbitrary

Open

    ¨ The task has more than one right answer.

    ¨ It has multiple avenues of approach, making it accessible to all students.

vs.

Closed

    ¨ inaccessible

    ¨ unreachable

Source: Stenmark, 1991.


SCORING SYSTEMS

The Shavelson group suggests seven-step process for developing a rubric:

There are many model rubrics in the assessment literature, and these can be used as the rubric development process begins and the conceptual framework is discussed.

A very generalized rubric which can be applied to any task distinguishes among three levels of performance.

A more specific rubric may be devised for generalized use, such as for oral presentations, problem-solving, and cooperative group work, or for specialized use with a specific task or unit. An example of a generalized rubric needed in the social studies is one assessing decision-making, which can be defined as selecting among apparently equal alternatives (Marzano, 1992) and the following student questions and subcompetencies.

STUDENT QUESTIONS

SUBCOMPETENCIES

¨ What/whom would be the best or worst?

¨ Which one has the most or least?

¨ Identifying appropriate and important alternatives to be considered

¨ Identifying important criteria used to assess the alternatives

¨ Accurately identifying the extent to which each alternative possesses each criteria

¨ Making a selection that adequately meets the decision criteria

Source: Marzano, et al, 1992.

These three scenarios all involve decision-making and can be assessed using the generalized rubric that follows.

Elementary School

Middle School

High School

Students work in pairs over a two week period of time, at the end of which they present their decision as an oral report with accompanying pictures and artifacts.

We have been studying many different parts of the country. Which one do you think would be the best place to live? Identify your selection and explain why it is the best place.

Students work independently or in groups over a two-week period of time. At the end of the time, they present their decisions as an oral presentation to the class who represent the people affected by their decisions.

Since the Revolutionary War, many important people have made decisions that have shaped our country. Select a figure who was instrumental in making a decision that altered the course of U.S. history. Put yourself in the place of that person and identify the alternatives the person was probably considering and the reason the person made the decision they did. You should be able to explain why the alternative you have selected is the best one.

Students work independently over a week's period of time. At the end of the week, they make their presentation in oral or written form.

Select an action by in influential person within the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries that had important consequences for world history. Determine the characteristics of the decision that had to have been made by this person before such an action was taken. What alternative choices were available to this person when he or she made the decision, and what criteria this person was likely to have applied in making his or her decision. What were the possible trade-offs in selecting one alternative over another? What were the risks, what were the rewards, and how would either be measured? Without benefit of hindsight, would you have mad the same choice? Explain why or why not.

Source: Marzano, et al, 1992.


Generalized Rubric for Decision-Making Task

4

3

2

1

Did the student select appropriate and important alternatives to be considered?

The alternatives presented are clearly articulated, appropriate to the task, and present a meaningful decision-making challenge.

The student clearly identifies alternatives that are appropriate to the task and that present a genuine decision making task.

The student does not present clear alternatives, or selects alternatives that are not completely appropriate to the task.

The student selects alternatives that do not address the real issue and present no worthwhile challenge.

Did the student select important and appropriate criteria with which to assess the identified alternatives? Was the student accurate in her assessment of how important the identified criteria are to the decision?

The student clearly and completely identifies the criteria by which the identified alternatives will be assessed. The criteria are presented in detail and reflect an unusually thorough understanding and concern for the ramifications of the decision.

The student clearly identifies the criteria by which the identified alternatives will be assessed. With no significant exceptions, the criteria are appropriate to the alternatives and important to the decision task.

The student correctly identifies the principle criteria by which the identified alternatives will be assessed. Some criteria might be omitted, or included criteria might not be important factors for consideration or entirely appropriate for the decision task.

The student does not specify any criteria appropriate for the selected alternatives or of importance to the decision.

Was the student accurate in their assessment of the extent to which the alternatives possess the identified characteristics?

The student provides a thorough, fully developed assessment of each alternative based upon the criteria. In addition, the student also provides comparison and contrast of the alternatives according to the extent each meet the criteria.

The student presents an accurate assessment of the extent to which the alternatives possess the identified criteria.

The student's assessment of the alternatives does not completely address all the criteria for evaluation; or, the student applies all appropriate criteria to the alternatives but is not completely accurate in assessing how well the criteria have been met.

The student does not use all necessary criteria for evaluating the decision alternatives. The criteria the student uses are incorrectly matched to the alternatives.

Did the final selection adequately meet decision criteria and answer the initial decision question?

The student selects an alternative consistent with its rating on the criteria. The selection represents a well-supported answer to the initial decision question. In addition, the student provides a useful discussion of problems that arose during the selection process.

The student successfully answers the decision question by selecting an alternatives that meets or exceeds established criteria.

The student selects an alternative that does not entirely conform to the student's assessment of the alternatives.

The student makes a selection that does not appear reasonable, or cannot be justified by the student's evaluation of the alternatives.

Source: Marzano, et. al. Toward A Comprehensive Model of Assessment. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Regional Research Educational Laboratory, April, 1992.

This generalized rubric can be turned into a scoring rubric, more readily useable in the classroom setting, by focusing on the key words from the generalized rubric. The rater, be they a teacher or invited outside rater, can use a checkoff system or a highlighting system as they assess a student's performance on a decision-making task.


Scoring Rubric for Decision-Making Task

4

3

2

1

Selection of appropriate and important alternatives to be considered

Alternatives are

__ clearly articulated

__ appropriate to the task

__ present a meaningful decision-making challenge

Alternatives are

__ appropriate to the task

__ present a genuine decision making task

Alternatives are

__ NOT clear

__ NOT completely appropriate to the task

Alternatives

__ do NOT address the real issue

__ present no worthwhile challenge

Selection of important and appropriate criteria with which to assess the identified alternatives

 

Accuracy of assessment of how important the identified criteria are to the decision

Criteria by which alternatives will be assessed are

__ Clearly and completely identified

__ Presented in detail

__ Reflect an unusually thorough understanding and concern for the ramifications of the decision

Criteria by which alternatives will be assessed are

__ Clearly identified

__ (With no significant exceptions) Appropriate to the alternatives

__ (With no significant exceptions) Important to the decision task

Criteria by which alternatives will be assessed

__Are correctly identified

__ Might be omitted

__ Might NOT be important factors for consideration

__ Might NOT be entirely appropriate for the decision task

Criteria by which alternatives will be assessed

__ Are NOT specified

__ Are NOT appropriate

__ Are NOT of importance to the decision

Accuracy of assessment of the extent to which the alternatives possess the identified characteristics

Assessment of alternatives

__ Is thorough

__ Is fully-developed

__ Is based upon the criteria

__ Contains a comparison and contrast

Assessment of alternatives

__ Is accurate

     

     

Assessment of alternatives

__ Does NOT completely address all the criteria for evaluation

__ Is NOT completely accurate

Assessment of alternatives

__ Is NOT based on all necessary criteria

__ Is NOT correctly matched to the criteria

Adequacy of final selection in meeting decision criteria and answering the initial decision question

Final selection

__ Is consistent with its rating on the criteria

__ Represents a well-supported answer to the initial decision question

__ Includes a useful discussion of problems that arose during the process

Final selection

__ Successfully answers decision question

__ Is based on alternatives that meet or exceed established criteria

Final selection

__ Does not entirely conform to the student's assessment of the alternatives

     

     

Final selection

__ Does NOT appear reasonable

__ CANNOT be justified by the student's evaluation of the alternatives


Previous Page Social Studies Contents Next Page