HOME | Arts | Health | Language Arts | Math/Science | Social Studies | World Languages | Glossary
Models which aid in an understanding of the social studies can include:




INTERVIEWS/SURVEYS/POLLS
INTERVIEWS
Interviewing allows for first-hand data collection. Students in
first grade can practice interviewing skills by asking their
classmates questions about their birthdays. Students ask questions
and then use data collected from the interviewee to create a greeting
for the birthday child. The teacher records the data in a word bank
to share with the child's family.
Another example of interviewing involves middle school students
interviewing someone about their work in a profession they would like
to enter about their work. This type of interviewing is helpful as
students begin to make decisions about where to live, work, travel,
and seek new opportunities (Geography Standard 2).
SURVEY
Technology can aid in conducting surveys beyond the boundaries of the local area. Students in Cold Bay used the following survey to collect data about cost of living in communities in their AT&T learning circle.
INDIVIDUAL SCHOOL/COMMUNITY DATA TALLY SHEET
SCHOOL NAME:______________________
LOCATION:_________________________
For each of the items listed below, please answer the questions below the list.
|
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Questions:
A. Can you buy this item in your community?
B. How much does it cost (in U.S. dollars)?
C. What does it cost before any taxes (local, provisional, or national) are assessed?
D. From where does the item come (what country or region of your country)?
Source: Clawson, Linn. The Cost of Living: The
Effect of Geography on Living Costs. 1994.
POLLS
Polls can be used to collect data within the community and provide ways, as in this example, for students to conduct experimental inquiry.
Conduct a poll in your group about who should win the election for President of the United States. Based on the findings from your group, make a prediction about how people in the community feel about the presidency. Then conduct interviews in the community about who should win. Report on the selection of your group and the findings based on the interviews from the community. Make sure you relate the findings from the community with your original prediction.
Source: Marzano, et al, 1992.
ORAL HISTORY
Dorothy Orbison of Sitka has worked extensively with oral history in the classroom. She outlines a process for working with students who are interviewing members of the World War II generation. (The following is reproduced with the permission of Dorothy Orbison.)
General Background Knowledge
Focus Background Preparation
Interview and Writing Process
RESEARCH
Research in the social studies can take a variety of
forms, as illustrated by the examples that follow. Problem-solving is
integral to research and conclusions should be directly related back
to an original hypothesis.
|
Students work in pairs over a one-week
period. They present their data in a chart and summarize
their conclusions in a written report. Geographers tell us that the earth has more water than land. Conduct your own experiment using a globe to determine how much of the earth is water and how much is land. First, make a guess by simply looking at the globe. Then, spin the globe and have your partner point to a spot on the globe without looking. Did you point to water or land. Keep doing this and record your results in a chart. How were your results converted to fractions? Do your results support the estimate? Explain. |
Students work in cooperative groups for three to four weeks, depending on accessibility of museums, libraries, etc.
Source: Marzano, et al, 1992.
ROLE-PLAY
"Role-play allows students the opportunity to portray real-world
situations. This requires students to use reasoning and
problem-solving to deal with the reality of the experience as it
unfolds." (Kentucky Frameworks) An example of role-playing is
provided in the vignette on page ??? describing "The Last Wild Place
on Planet Earth." Role-playing can also be designed around current,
real-world leaders and issues. For example, students might role-play
the G-7 leaders meeting at a summit to discuss economic issues or
Native, governmental, business, environmental, and community leaders
meeting to decide the fate of the Arctic National Wildlife
Refuge.
SIMULATIONS
Mock trials are an especially effective type of simulation for the social studies, specifically in relation to Government/Citizenship Standard 2: All Alaska students will understand the constitutional foundations of the American political system and the democratic ideals of our nation and its Key Element 8: understand the place of law in the American political system. Topics can originate from either historical, citizenship, or geographic situations. For example:
Mock trials can become an assessment centerpiece for a social
studies program. This technique is utilized at Mt. Edgecumbe High
School in Sitka where Don Surgeon guides students through a series of
mock trials over the four years of high school. Students work closely
with the magistrate and with local lawyers when preparing their
cases.
|
In the ninth grade, students read the novel To Kill A Mockingbird and use the actual trial questions and closing arguments from the book as a the basis for a mock trial. Students then write and rewrite questions, opening, and closing arguments. The trial is also moved in time and location to current year and local community in order to add to the dilemma. Students are also able to access prior years' mock trials and to observe other mock trials (senior trial discussed below) before putting on this mock trial. |
In the eleventh grade, students use the national competition mock trial. Topics in recent years have included a drug case involving a car search, drunk driving, battered women's syndrome, and educational malpractice. |
In the twelfth grade, students create their own mock trial, from deciding the topic to writing all questions, opening, and closing statements, and generating evidence. The trials designed by the students have centered around abortion (with the male's role in the decision and paternity being central to the case), date rape, fetal alcohol syndrome and fetal alcohol effects, and police brutality, among others. |
DESIGNING
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS AND SCORING RUBRICS
Components of performance assessments include the (1) performance
task, (2) a response format, and (3) a scoring system.
Steps in Developing Performance Assessments
In an ideal setting, performance assessments can be developed by a
development team of teachers, subject matter educators, subject
matter professors, and assessment specialists (Shavelson, 1994);
however, in the school setting, teachers may work alone or on grade
level or interdisciplinary teams to develop performance assessments.
In any case, what follows are some suggested steps for developing
performance assessments. These are adapted from work by the
Connecticut Department of Education.
Source: Stenmark, 1991.
One strong recommendation that comes from classroom educator who
has worked with assessment over a period of several years is to pace
yourself when developing new assessments. Teachers should remember
that translating all assessment to alternative means does not mean
that a whole year's worth of alternative assessments are not done at
once, or even during the course of one year. Designing quality
assessment pieces is not quick and easy. Develop one idea, become
comfortable with it, and then move on. What this means is that, in
reality, teachers should plan on designing an assessment or
assessments for one unit each year. This is especially true for when
working with a team of teachers and allowing time for thoughtful
discussion during all phases from design, to implementation, to
piloting, and to revision.
Criteria for Performance Tasks
In addition to a pilot test with small groups of students and with an entire class, good performance task can be evaluated according to the following criteria.
|
Essential |
¨ The task fist into the core of the curriculum.¨ It represents the big idea. |
vs. |
Tangential ¨ divergent¨ incidental¨ peripheral |
|
Authentic |
¨ The task uses processes appropriate to the discipline.¨ Students value the outcome of the task. |
vs. |
Contrived ¨ devised¨ invented¨ made up |
|
Rich |
¨ The task leads to others.¨ It raises other questions.¨ It has many possibilities. |
vs. |
Superficial ¨ shallow¨ cursory¨ one-dimensional |
|
Engaging |
¨ The task is thought-provoking.¨ It fosters persistence. |
vs. |
Uninteresting |
|
Active |
¨ The student is the worker and the decision-maker.¨ Students interact with other students.¨ Students are constructing meaning and deepening understanding. |
vs. |
Passive ¨ inactive¨ quiet¨ idle |
|
Feasible |
¨ The task can be done within school and homework time.¨ It is developmentally appropriate for students.¨ It is safe. |
vs. |
Infeasible ¨ impractical¨ unworkable¨ unattainable |
|
Equitable |
¨ The task develops thinking in a variety of styles.¨ It contributes to positive attitudes. |
vs. |
Inequitable ¨ unfair¨ unjust¨ arbitrary |
|
Open |
¨ The task has more than one right answer.¨ It has multiple avenues of approach, making it accessible to all students. |
vs. |
Closed ¨ inaccessible¨ unreachable |
Source: Stenmark, 1991.
SCORING SYSTEMS
The Shavelson group suggests seven-step process for developing a rubric:
1. develop a conceptual framework for a rubric
2. administer an assessment to the students
3. categorize their responses into levels
4. characterize each level with a description of performance and examples
5. reach consensus for scoring standards
6. train a large team of raters
7. score students' assessments
There are many model rubrics in the assessment literature, and these can be used as the rubric development process begins and the conceptual framework is discussed.
A very generalized rubric which can be applied to any task distinguishes among three levels of performance.
¨
Demonstrated Competence¨
Exemplary¨
Competent¨
Satisfactory Response¨
Minor flaws but satisfactory¨
Serious flaws but satisfactory¨
Inadequate response¨
Begins but fails to complete problem¨
Unable to begin effectively¨
No attemptA more specific rubric may be devised for generalized use, such as for oral presentations, problem-solving, and cooperative group work, or for specialized use with a specific task or unit. An example of a generalized rubric needed in the social studies is one assessing decision-making, which can be defined as selecting among apparently equal alternatives (Marzano, 1992) and the following student questions and subcompetencies.
|
STUDENT QUESTIONS |
SUBCOMPETENCIES |
|
¨ What/whom would be the best or worst?¨ Which one has the most or least? |
¨ Identifying appropriate and important alternatives to be considered¨ Identifying important criteria used to assess the alternatives¨ Accurately identifying the extent to which each alternative possesses each criteria¨ Making a selection that adequately meets the decision criteria |
Source: Marzano, et al, 1992.
These three scenarios all involve decision-making and can be assessed using the generalized rubric that follows.
|
Elementary School |
Middle School |
High School |
|
Students work in pairs over a two week period of time, at the end of which they present their decision as an oral report with accompanying pictures and artifacts. We have been studying many different parts of the country. Which one do you think would be the best place to live? Identify your selection and explain why it is the best place. |
Students work independently or in groups over a two-week period of time. At the end of the time, they present their decisions as an oral presentation to the class who represent the people affected by their decisions. Since the Revolutionary War, many important people have made decisions that have shaped our country. Select a figure who was instrumental in making a decision that altered the course of U.S. history. Put yourself in the place of that person and identify the alternatives the person was probably considering and the reason the person made the decision they did. You should be able to explain why the alternative you have selected is the best one. |
Students work independently over a week's period of time. At the end of the week, they make their presentation in oral or written form. Select an action by in influential person within the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries that had important consequences for world history. Determine the characteristics of the decision that had to have been made by this person before such an action was taken. What alternative choices were available to this person when he or she made the decision, and what criteria this person was likely to have applied in making his or her decision. What were the possible trade-offs in selecting one alternative over another? What were the risks, what were the rewards, and how would either be measured? Without benefit of hindsight, would you have mad the same choice? Explain why or why not. |
Source: Marzano, et al, 1992.
Generalized Rubric for Decision-Making Task
|
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
Did the student select appropriate and important alternatives to be considered? |
The alternatives presented are clearly articulated, appropriate to the task, and present a meaningful decision-making challenge. |
The student clearly identifies alternatives that are appropriate to the task and that present a genuine decision making task. |
The student does not present clear alternatives, or selects alternatives that are not completely appropriate to the task. |
The student selects alternatives that do not address the real issue and present no worthwhile challenge. |
|
Did the student select important and appropriate criteria with which to assess the identified alternatives? Was the student accurate in her assessment of how important the identified criteria are to the decision? |
The student clearly and completely identifies the criteria by which the identified alternatives will be assessed. The criteria are presented in detail and reflect an unusually thorough understanding and concern for the ramifications of the decision. |
The student clearly identifies the criteria by which the identified alternatives will be assessed. With no significant exceptions, the criteria are appropriate to the alternatives and important to the decision task. |
The student correctly identifies the principle criteria by which the identified alternatives will be assessed. Some criteria might be omitted, or included criteria might not be important factors for consideration or entirely appropriate for the decision task. |
The student does not specify any criteria appropriate for the selected alternatives or of importance to the decision. |
|
Was the student accurate in their assessment of the extent to which the alternatives possess the identified characteristics? |
The student provides a thorough, fully developed assessment of each alternative based upon the criteria. In addition, the student also provides comparison and contrast of the alternatives according to the extent each meet the criteria. |
The student presents an accurate assessment of the extent to which the alternatives possess the identified criteria. |
The student's assessment of the alternatives does not completely address all the criteria for evaluation; or, the student applies all appropriate criteria to the alternatives but is not completely accurate in assessing how well the criteria have been met. |
The student does not use all necessary criteria for evaluating the decision alternatives. The criteria the student uses are incorrectly matched to the alternatives. |
|
Did the final selection adequately meet decision criteria and answer the initial decision question? |
The student selects an alternative consistent with its rating on the criteria. The selection represents a well-supported answer to the initial decision question. In addition, the student provides a useful discussion of problems that arose during the selection process. |
The student successfully answers the decision question by selecting an alternatives that meets or exceeds established criteria. |
The student selects an alternative that does not entirely conform to the student's assessment of the alternatives. |
The student makes a selection that does not appear reasonable, or cannot be justified by the student's evaluation of the alternatives. |
Source: Marzano, et. al. Toward A Comprehensive Model of Assessment. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Regional Research Educational Laboratory, April, 1992.
This generalized rubric can be turned into a scoring rubric, more readily useable in the classroom setting, by focusing on the key words from the generalized rubric. The rater, be they a teacher or invited outside rater, can use a checkoff system or a highlighting system as they assess a student's performance on a decision-making task.
Scoring Rubric for Decision-Making Task
|
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
Selection of appropriate and important alternatives to be considered |
Alternatives are __ clearly articulated __ appropriate to the task __ present a meaningful decision-making challenge |
Alternatives are __ appropriate to the task __ present a genuine decision making task |
Alternatives are __ NOT clear __ NOT completely appropriate to the task |
Alternatives __ do NOT address the real issue __ present no worthwhile challenge |
|
Selection of important and appropriate criteria with which to assess the identified alternatives
Accuracy of assessment of how important the identified criteria are to the decision |
Criteria by which alternatives will be assessed are __ Clearly and completely identified __ Presented in detail __ Reflect an unusually thorough understanding and concern for the ramifications of the decision |
Criteria by which alternatives will be assessed are __ Clearly identified __ (With no significant exceptions) Appropriate to the alternatives __ (With no significant exceptions) Important to the decision task |
Criteria by which alternatives will be assessed __Are correctly identified __ Might be omitted __ Might NOT be important factors for consideration __ Might NOT be entirely appropriate for the decision task |
Criteria by which alternatives will be assessed __ Are NOT specified __ Are NOT appropriate __ Are NOT of importance to the decision |
|
Accuracy of assessment of the extent to which the alternatives possess the identified characteristics |
Assessment of alternatives __ Is thorough __ Is fully-developed __ Is based upon the criteria __ Contains a comparison and contrast |
Assessment of alternatives __ Is accurate
|
Assessment of alternatives __ Does NOT completely address all the criteria for evaluation __ Is NOT completely accurate |
Assessment of alternatives __ Is NOT based on all necessary criteria __ Is NOT correctly matched to the criteria |
|
Adequacy of final selection in meeting decision criteria and answering the initial decision question |
Final selection __ Is consistent with its rating on the criteria __ Represents a well-supported answer to the initial decision question __ Includes a useful discussion of problems that arose during the process |
Final selection __ Successfully answers decision question __ Is based on alternatives that meet or exceed established criteria |
Final selection __ Does not entirely conform to the student's assessment of the alternatives
|
Final selection __ Does NOT appear reasonable __ CANNOT be justified by the student's evaluation of the alternatives |