|
Switch to Writing
Reading Assessment
|
Assessment (by standards)
Examples of Instruction and Assessment by Standard
The following charts have examples of classroom tasks
that address the five Language Arts standards and fulfill
both instructional and assessment purposes simultaneously.
The charts are intentionally incomplete. No instruction
or assessment strategy is necessarily better than any
other. Tasks should be selected or designed to fit the
purpose and content for your particular grade and purpose.
Language Arts Standards:
- Speak and Write
- Read, Listen and View
- Complete Independent Projects
- Present and Explain Positions
- Understand and Respect Others' Perspectives
| Standard
A: A student should be able to speak and
write well for a variety of purposes and audiences. |
Task What is
the student doing? |
Purpose Why
is it performed? |
Supportive Instruction / Scaffolding
How do we as teachers and students get there? |
Assessment Tool
How is it measured? |
| Instruction |
Assessment |
| Using a journal or learning log |
To clarify thinking and prepare for discussion
To apply elements of effective writing |
To evaluate language proficiency and clarity
To evaluate student attitudes |
Guided practice
*Modeling |
Checklist
Rubric
Self-evaluation
Peer response checklist |
| Discussing a video |
To comprehend content
To extend thinking |
To evaluate ability to apply to life
To evaluate analytical and oral skills |
Preview discussion
Viewing and stopping video, modeling discussion
Note taking
Venn diagram |
Anecdotal record
Note taking rubric
Observational checklist |
| Preparing exhibitions |
To read effectively / thoroughly |
To evaluate synthesis of information |
Guided practice |
Strategy checklist
Anecdotal notes
Running records |
| Writing a descriptive essay |
To clarify thinking
To apply elements of effective writing |
To evaluate writing skills |
Guided practice
Writing process practice
Modeling application of rubric to one's own and
others' writing |
Self / peer analysis
Checklist
Rubric |
| Standard
B: A student should be a competent and thoughtful
reader, listener, and viewer of literature, technical
materials, and a variety of other information. |
Task What is
the student doing? |
Purpose
Why is it performed? |
Supportive Instruction / Scaffolding
How do we as teachers and students get there? |
Assessment Tool
How is it measured? |
| Instruction |
Assessment |
| Viewing and discussing a video |
To develop listening skills
To gain information
|
To evaluate viewing skills
To evaluate comprehension and analysis of information
|
Reflecting on prior knowledge
Stopping video periodically and modeling discussion
Note taking during viewing
Fast write practice
|
Checklist of listening skills
Anecdotal map on fishbowl discussion
Quiz
|
| Selecting and reading aloud a piece of fiction in
a small discussion group |
To develop reading strategies
To develop ability to respond orally to literature
|
To evaluate use of reading strategies
To evaluate skill to respond to literature, both
literally and inferentially
|
Teacher reads aloud and models personal use of
reading strategies
Student analysis of tape recording of own reading
and discussion
Coaching during reading
Fishbowl
|
Checklist of reading strategies
Analysis of student response journal
Running record
|
Reciprocal reading &
teaching
|
To develop listening skills
To develop note taking ability
To formulate questions
To comprehend while reading
|
To evaluate use of reading strategies
To evaluate skills of responding to literature
both literally and inferentially
To evaluate listening skills
|
Reviewing and modeling listening skills
Questioning during reading
Note taking during reading and listening
Guided practice
|
Peer observation with anecdotal notes
Checklist of reading strategies |
| Standard
C: A student should be able to identify and
select from multiple strategies in order to complete
projects independently and cooperatively. |
Task What is
the student doing? |
Purpose Why
is it performed? |
Supportive Instruction / Scaffolding
How do we as teachers and students get there? |
Assessment Tool
How is it measured? |
| Instruction |
Assessment |
| As a group, developing a rubric to
evaluate an independent project |
To use task analysis skills
To select and use appropriate decision making
process
To learn cooperative group skills
To set high standards for project quality |
To evaluate task analysis skills, selection and
use appropriate decision making processes and/or standards
for project quality |
Guided practice in rubrics
Definition of quality
Analysis of projects
Task analysis
Practice in self/peer evaluation
Cooperative skills
|
Checklist
Peer review rubric
Panel of experts from community
|
| Selecting a project |
To make meaningful choices |
To evaluate how student selects from among many
choices |
Brainstorming
Prioritizing
Evaluating resources
Time management |
Teacher observation
Conferencing
Parental involvement
Rubric
|
| Developing a plan for independent project |
To understand and execute directions
To make and keep deadlines
To seek, select, and use relevant resources
|
To evaluate understanding and execution of directions,
ability to set and keep deadlines, and/or ability
in seeking, selecting, and using relevant resources |
Note taking skills
Library/research technology
Problem solving
Keeping deadlines
Following directions
|
Teacher observation with mental notes
Conferencing
Community involvement
Project rubric
Peer response
|
| Completing an independent project |
To make choices about projects after examining
a range of possibilities
To organize a project by understanding directions,
making and keeping deadlines, and seeking, selecting,
and using relevant resources
To set high standards for project quality
To evaluate self
To select and use appropriate decision-making
processes |
To evaluate choices, organization, self evaluation,
ability to set high standards, and/or decision-making
processes |
Guided practice and modeling in
- Time management
- Evaluating resources
- Interview techniques
- Library/research
- Technology
- Problem solving
- Goal setting
|
Response form completed by
- Community member,
- Parent,
- Self,
- Mentor,
- Teacher, and/or
- Independent boards
|
| Standard
D: A student should be able to think logically
and reflectively in order to present and explain positions
based on relevant and reliable information. |
Task What is
the student doing? |
Purpose Why
is it performed? |
Supportive Instruction / Scaffolding
How do we as teachers and students get there? |
Assessment Tool
How is it measured? |
| Instruction |
Assessment |
| Writing a persuasive essay based on
research |
To use logic to persuade
To apply research skills
|
To evaluate ability to reason
To evaluate how students do and use research
|
Model the steps necessary to write the piece
Note taking
Use of research library
Conducting of an interview
Practice web, map, fishbone
|
Writing rubric
Interview checklist
Peer response scoring form
|
| Debating a topic based on above research |
To learn to support one’s position orally
To use research and realistic evidence
To construct a persuasive argument |
To evaluate ability to state their position and
support it
To evaluate ability to select reliable information
To evaluate persuasive skills
|
Teacher/peer modeling
Watching a debate or video
Tutoring on debate techniques
Cross - age coaching models
|
Class vote
Peer/self evaluation based on rubric
|
| Group fishbowl discussing an author’s purpose
in a text |
To work with texts to determine author’s purpose |
To evaluate thinking and listening skills for outer
circle |
Practice finding appropriate evidence or support
Practice fishbowl discussion
Practice writing observations
|
Listeners’ written observations
Teacher rubric
Anecdotal map
|
| Taking a position on a controversial issue and writing
a letter to a policy maker to explain position |
To develop a position by:
- reflecting on personal experiences, prior knowledge,
and new information; formulating and refining
questions;
- identifying a variety of pertinent sources
of information;
- analyzing and synthesizing information
|
To evaluate the validity, objectivity, reliability,
and quality of information read, heard, and seen |
Guided practice working with elements listed in
column two
Model letters to editors and legislators
|
Rubric to assess logical position, appropriate support,
evidence, and explanation |
| Standard
E: A student should understand and respect
the perspectives of others in order to communicate
effectively. |
Task What is
the student doing? |
Purpose Why
is it performed? |
Supportive Instruction / Scaffolding
How do we as teachers and students get there? |
Assessment Tool
How is it measured? |
| Instruction |
Assessment |
| Students creating and presenting a
skit that illustrates communication styles in different
cultures |
To recognize communication styles in different
cultures and their possible effects on others |
To evaluate awareness of styles |
Use guided practice with Venn diagrams
Brainstorm commonalties in cultures
|
Applause meter
Rubric |
| Given an example of a culture other than their own,
students brainstorming a list of communication style
elements which are different from their own |
To recognize communication styles in different cultures
and their possible effects on others |
To verify recognition |
Use guided practice in analysis of one's own
communication style
Making generalizations
Recognizing exceptions to generalization
|
The list generated by the group
Outside expert to provide feed back
|
| Read a newspaper editorial, identify the bias, and
support it with examples in the text |
To recognize bias in a written editorial |
To verify recognition |
Comparing an editorial and news story for identifying
bias |
Checklist
Peer review
Rubric |
| Reading a non-fiction article set in a different
culture and completing a Venn diagram of cultural
values |
To use information and literature of many types
and cultures, both oral and written, to understand
self and others |
To verify understanding |
Guided practice with applying to an article or video |
Checklist
Rubric |
| Using the diagram above, writing a letter to yourself
as if you were the narrator of the article and describing
how your cultures are alike and different |
To explore speaker’s or author’s point
of view |
To evaluate ability to determine point of view |
Letter writing practice |
Rubric for evaluation of ideas and content
Response to letter by peers |
| Writing and dramatizing first person narratives
of unpopular characters |
To express oneself from another’s point of
view |
To assess student’s understanding and application
of point of view |
Dramatization practice
Guided practice in character analysis using a smaller
piece
|
Teacher observation
Peer evaluation
Rubric |
|
 |
|