HOME | Arts | Health | Language Arts | Math/Science | Social Studies | World Languages | Glossary

Alaska Department of Education & Early Development
Mathematics and Science Education

Chapter 3: Context


References for the Curriculum Development Process in Mathematics and Science
Preservice Education and Professional Development
Learning Partners and School to Work
Equity
Early Childhood Education
Technology
Other Resources: Staff, Time, Materials, Supplies, Equipment, Facilities

The Getting Started and Starting Points chapters discuss many issues and strategies for creating an overall educational plan that helps all students attain the Alaska student standards. This chapter describes specific issues, strategies, and references for science and mathematics education.


Previous Page | Math/Science Contents | Next Page


References for the Curriculum Development Process in Mathematics and Science

Additional Considerations for Math and Science:

A curriculum development process guide is included in the Getting Started chapter of this document. That guide is appropriate for any content area. This section provides specific references addressing science and mathematics curriculum development.

For More Science and Mathematics Information:

Association of State Supervisors of Mathematics. (1993). Guide to Selecting Instructional Materials for Mathematical Education. ASSM. This publication provides guidelines for choosing instructional materials and is helpful if a district wants to adopt a textbook. It is included in the Resource Notebook of the Reference Kit.

California State Board of Education. (1992) Science Framework for California Public Schools. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education. p. 172-174, 181-194. These sections outline a step-by-step process for determining curriculum needs and writing a curriculum matrix.

Cheek, D.W., Briggs, R., and Yager, R.E. eds. (1992) Science Curriculum Resources Handbook: A Practical Guide for K-12 Science Curriculum. Millwood, NY: Kraus International Publications. Ch. 2 p. 42-58. This chapter covers both the process and content considerations of developing district curriculum guidelines.

Jacobs, H. (1994). "Curriculum Mapping". The Curriculum Designer's Group. A paper in the Resource Notebook of the Reference Kit. This is a collection of matrices for the scope and sequence of all courses in one New Jersey school district.

Kentucky Department of Education. (1993). Transformations: Kentucky's Curriculum Framework. Frankfort, KY: Kentucky Department of Education. P. 35-63. This section of the Kentucky Framework document provides a comprehensive listing of suggestions for each phase of the curriculum development process.

Loucks-Horsley, S. et al. (1990) Elementary School Science for the '90s. Alexandria, VA: ASCD Publications. Ch 2 p.11-26

Madrazo, G. M., and LaMoine, L. M. (1993). Sourcebook for Science Supervisors. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association and National Science Supervisors Association.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, Virginia.


Preservice Education and Professional Development

Additional Considerations for Math and Science:

The Alaska Department of Education & Early Development is now working on recommended guidelines for teacher preparation and certification to support the standards. See Results of Survey.

Most teachers were taught science as a set of facts. In science labs they followed "recipes" for lab work in which one predetermined outcome was expected. They were taught the basic skills in math, and they were taught to solve more difficult computations by applying memorized algorithms. They will continue to rely on these methods until they experience for themselves instruction that asks them to

These personal educational experiences must be provided through preservice education and professional development opportunities. They should provide appropriate modeling in content, instruction, and assessment, and they should reference developmentally appropriate practice for students of all ages. This requires collaboration between the science, math, and education departments within teacher preparation institutions and K-12 schools.

In addition, teachers learning these constructive approaches to teaching need support as they develop

For More Science and Mathematics Information:

Alaska Teacher Education Standards (The Reference Points). This is a list of the regulations governing teacher education for the State of Alaska.

California State Board of Education. (1992) Science Framework for California Public Schools. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education p. 175-176. This section contains a short summary of issues and suggestions related to professional development.

Kentucky Department of Education. (1993). Transformations: Kentucky's Curriculum Framework. Frankfort, KY: Kentucky Department of Education. p. 61. This contains a list of attributes of effective professional development plans.

Loucks-Horsley, S. et al. (1990) Elementary School Science for the '90s. Alexandria, VA.: ASCD Publications. Ch 11, 12 & 13. This provides practical guidelines and references for viewing staff development as a continuous process, choosing effective staff development approaches, and providing support programs.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics. Reston VA: NCTM. p. 123-173. This is a detailed explanation of the standards for the support and development of mathematics teachers and teaching.

NCTM. (1991). Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics. Reston VA: NCTM. p. 19-67. This chapter describes in detail the NCTM Standards for Teaching Mathematics.

NCTM. (1995). Assessment Standards for School Mathematics Reston VA: NCTM. p. 207-213. This document makes a strong case for involving teachers and other stakeholders in the process of developing reasonable and effective assessment tools.

National Research Council. (1995). National Science Education Standards. Washington DC: National Academy Press. The chapters on Science Teaching Standards, Standards for the Professional Development of Teachers of Science, and Science Education Systems Standards provide more detailed information on broad-scaled systemic change issues.


Learning Partners and School to Work

Additional Considerations for Math and Science:

Alaska has a wealth of potential learning partners to strengthen the science and mathematical experiences of our students. Consider some of the following partnerships:

For More Science and Mathematics Information:

Committee for Economic Development. (1994). Putting Learning First, Executive Summary NY, NY: CED. p. 6 This booklet is in the Resource Notebook of the Reference Kit. The executive summary of the research could be distributed for discussions groups in the community.

Hands-On Science. (1993). Putting Together a Family Science Festival. Rockville, MD: Hands-On Science Program.

NCTM. (1991). Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics. Reston VA: NCTM. p. 177-186. This is a detailed description of the standards for the support and development of mathematics teachers and teaching.

Stenmark, J., Thompson, V., and Cossey, R. (1986). Family Math. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Hall of Science.


Equity

Additional Considerations for Math and Science:

Less than ten percent of all high school students have had access to four years of college preparatory science and mathematics courses. All students are capable of understanding and applying advanced concepts in these fields if instruction is developmentally and culturally appropriate. Schools have reduced the equity gap in science and mathematics by:

Creative science and math instruction can produce more equitable learning environments by using the powers of scientific inquiry, mathematical reasoning, and culturally-inquisitive investigations and applications to foster cooperation and social justice within schools. Consider some of the following suggestions:

See Equity Issues in Science and Math Bibliography.

For More Science and Mathematics Information:

Murphy, N. (1996). Multicultural Math and Science: Effective K-12 Practices for Math and Science Equity. Columbus, OH: ERIC Science, Math Environmental Education Clearinghouse. (This Eric Digest is in the Resource Notebook).

Other helpful curriculum ideas can be obtained from the National Indian Education Association (NIA), American Indian Society for Engineering and Science (AISES) [WWW page = http://bioc02.uthscsa.edu/aisesnet.html], the Native American Resources Page [http://www.ota.gov/nativea.html] and (MESA), COMETS (Career Oriented Modules to Explore Topics in Science); and Outdoor World Science.


Early Childhood Education

Additional Considerations for Math and Science:

Young children need ample opportunities to express their ideas with real items (concrete objects or manipulatives) before expressing those ideas with symbols. Make sure that each early childhood classroom (K-3) has flexible combinations of manipulatives for students to use at all times. Curriculum options such as "Math Their Way" and "Box It and Bag It" provide appropriate experiences with easily made manipulatives and provide bridges for more abstract representation of mathematical ideas and problem-solving with symbols. Projects in art, music, and other disciplines that allow students to recognize cause and effect relationships, classify objects and create categories, compare and contrast, predict and interpret results, and test their own theories while working and playing with real objects promote developmentally appropriate inquiry behaviors for young children.

All young children should be expected and allowed to solve challenging problems even if they have not yet mastered their basic math facts. Make sure that manipulatives are available for children to use to help solve problems that otherwise would require abstract reasoning or recalling facts.

Older learners also benefit from instruction that first provides hands-on experiences with simple models of the phenomena before expanding into symbolic representations and abstract ideas. Teachers of older students should provide both instruction and assessment with concrete manipulatives if the content is confusing to the students.

An effective model for helping young children construct their own scientific theories is "Look, Guess, Test, Tell." Children should be encouraged to construct their own unique explanations of phenomena and to describe how their theories explain their observations and experiences. They should struggle to identify the reasoning behind their beliefs. This process of inquiry is more important during these years than developing accurate knowledge of how things work.

For More Science and Mathematics Information:

McIntyre, M. (1984). Early Childhood and Science. Arlington, VA: NSTA.

Chaille, C. and Britton, L. (1991). The Young Child as Scientist. NY: Harper.

Kamii, C.K. (1985). Young Children Reinvent Arithmetic: Implications of Piaget's Theory. New York: Teacher's College Press.


Technology

Additional Considerations for Math and Science:

Technology can provide science and math experiences for students that otherwise would not be possible. It can provide linkages into the home, community, university, and workplace to increase students' contact with learning partners. Interactive media models experiences that are not possible through the limited science lab facilities at most schools. Computer based labs and probeware allow students to collect and analyze technical data with accuracy and ease. Simulations stimulate students to use mathematical and scientific reasoning to solve realistic problems of urban renewal, overpopulation, and other social issues. Software tools such as databases and spreadsheets allow students to focus on defining the problem and comparing alternative solutions while simplifying the redundant computations that would otherwise be involved. Graphing calculators make it financially possible for the entire class to simultaneously utilize technology for many of these purposes.

At a minimum, each school should have a well-maintained computer lab with integrated word processing, database, spreadsheet, and graphing software, software that develops the visual-spatial abilities of all students, software that supports pattern awareness and sequencing, software that supports any drill and practice needs for math facts with connections to the concrete concepts of addition, subtraction, multiplication and addition, interactive software for discovery learning in geometry, algebra, and calculus, CD-ROM disks that support the major content areas in science with excellent graphics, and simulations of a variety of issues-oriented science topics with integrated math applications. Each elementary school should have several classroom sets of calculators. Each middle school and high school should have classroom sets of graphing calculators and accompanying probeware or the equivalent computer-based software and hardware. Ideally each classroom should have at least six computer workstations to allow teachers to integrate technology centers into the day and to allow students to analyze and display data for ongoing projects. Each teacher should have a networked computer with audiovisual capabilities to allow the students to interact with mentors, learning partners, and potential employers.

See Useful Software for Science and Mathematics Education for lists of useful science and math software.

For More Science and Mathematics Information:

California State Board of Education. (1992). Science Framework for California Public Schools. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education p. 178-180, 199-213. These sections suggest effective teaching and technology resources and the criteria for choosing instructional materials.


Other Resources: Staff, Time, Materials, Supplies, Equipment, Facilities

Additional Considerations for Math and Science:

Staff Resources

The district must recruit highly qualified math and science teachers who have specific science and math endorsements or coursework and specific training in a variety of instructional strategies and methodologies.

It is imperative that districts make teaching assignments based on the needs of the students and the qualifications and strengths of teachers, not what is most convenient for the schedule, the other teachers, or the administration.

It is essential that a district provide a support system for beginning math and science teachers to ensure continuous professional growth and commitment. (This may involve a mentor teacher, time to observe others, coursework, and involvement in the Alaska Science and Math Consortia.)

At the elementary level, if science or math specialists are not available, people within the building or district who have special expertise in certain facets of science or math need to be identified and utilized as peer coaches and leadership support teams.

Time Resources

The amount of time spent on an instructional topic directly affects the students' learning. Although time alone will not improve student learning (adequate staff development, materials, and facilities are necessary as well), student learning will not improve if adequate time is not provided. The National Science Teachers Association recommends the minimum amount of time spent on science instruction per week as two and one-half hours for primary grades and four hours for intermediate grades. The National Center for Improving Science Education recommends twice that much. The Scope Sequence and Coordination agenda for secondary science reform suggests that all secondary students take courses in each of the science disciplines every year of their secondary school experience (rather than starting with the biological sciences and advancing into the physical sciences only if they are successful in the earlier courses).

The NCTM Standards do not specify minimum time allotments for mathematics instruction, but they do recommend that all students be exposed to the major strands of mathematics throughout every year of their education. The Standards suggest that all students experience algebra, geometry, probability, statistics, and discrete mathematics repeatedly throughout their pre-college experience. This transition requires more time spent on significant conceptual development, rather than the traditional use of time mastering basic skills and facts.

It is essential that time also be provided for short and long term planning. To have successful classrooms, teachers need time to set up and take down labs. Schedules should take transition time into consideration. A teacher with multiple course preparation requirements and no prep time at the high school level teaches less effectively than a teacher with the time to adequately prepare.

Materials, Supplies, Equipment

Appropriate materials for math and science instruction promote the desired math and science outcomes. They must be in alignment with the goals and expectations of math and science curriculum, including the assessment component. The new demands of technology are expensive, and funding practices must be aligned with the needs. This requires strong advocates for school funding through private donations, local levies, state-wide initiatives, and grant work. Numerous resources offer detailed lists of appropriate science and math materials and equipment that should be part of a program. Check with the Alaska Department of Education & Early Development, your state and national organizations and their documents, commercial companies, your master teachers in science and math, other states' framework documents if this type of listing would be desirable. However, these lists will be more valuable if they are created by teachers in direct response to their instructional needs. Most often, by the time districts are to the stage of planning for materials, they find that a list made by someone else will not meet their needs.

Facility Resources

The Alaska Content Standards require an emphasis on connections and applications of science and math within other disciplines and real-life contexts. Science is no longer "lab dependent". Therefore, teachers must have an environment in which they can easily incorporate math and science into their other studies. Classrooms should have tables that promote small-group cooperative activities where students can easily decide to measure, construct, observe, and test objects and ideas. Students should have ready access to the world outside of the school building through telecommunications and doorways. Electrical outlets must be adequate and dependable to support the increased technology in the classroom. Windows should be designed to support instruction about light, reflection, and refraction. Mechanical spaces should be available for design and engineering studies. Buildings should be wired to support computer networking within the building, within the district, and through the Internet and World Wide Web.

Facilities need to be considered when developing curriculum. The Alaska Department of Education & Early Development, your state and national math and science organizations, your local health and safety inspector, your maintenance personnel, other state documents, school facility texts and manuals, and your master teachers in math and science are all good resources.

For More Science and Mathematics Information:

Taylor, A. (1993). How Schools are Redesigning Their Space. Educational Leadership. 51(1). 36-41. The author is the creator of the curriculum "Architecture and Children". This article shares examples of schools redesigning their spaces to match cultural preferences and to utilize the design elements within the curriculum.

California Department of Education. (1987). Science Safety Handbook for California High Schools. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education. This is a useful do-it-yourself manual for assuring safe facilities and programs.

California Department of Education. (1992). Science Facilities Design for California Public Schools. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education. Another do-it-yourself manual.

Cheek, D. W., Brigg, R., and Yager, R.E. (1992) Science Curriculum Resources Handbook: A Practical Guide for K-12 Science Curriculum. Millwood, NY: Kraus International Publications. Ch. 9, p.221-239. This includes a thorough, annotated bibliography of teaching resources and materials suppliers for science education K-12.

National Center for Improving Science Education. (1989) Developing and Supporting Teachers for Elementary School Science Education. Washington, DC.: NCISE. p. 52-59. This chapter provides a summary of resource considerations for science education.

NCTM. (1991). Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics. Reston VA: NCTM. p. 181-183. This describes in detail the standards for the support and development of mathematics teachers and teaching.


Previous Page | Math/Science Contents | Next Page