HOME | Arts | Health | Language Arts | Math/Science | Social Studies | World Languages | Glossary
English/Language Arts Framework Project,
Alaska Department of Education & Early Development,
801 W. 10th Street, Suite 200,
Juneau, AK, 99801-1894
Twenty-two Alaskan school districts responded to this survey in September, 1995.
CURRICULUM
In what year was your English/language arts curriculum last revised?
Grades K-8 |
Grades 9-12 |
Year 1985 2 districts |
Year 1985 2 districts |
Year 1989 4 districts |
Year 1989 3 districts |
Year 1990 1 district |
Year 1991 3 districts |
Year 1991 2 districts |
Year 1992 6 districts |
Year 1992 4 districts |
Year 1993 1 district |
Year 1993 1 districts |
Year 1994 2 districts |
Year 1994 2 districts |
Year 1995 4 districts |
Year 1995 3 districts |
Year 1996 1 district |
Who is involved in your curriculum review team?
22 of 22 districts include teachers with 11 districts
counting a total of 104.
21 of 22 districts include administrators with 10
districts counting a total of 25.
15 of 22 districts include parents with 8 districts
counting a total of 25.
5 of 22 districts include students with 1 district
counting a total of 1.
11 of 22 districts include community members with 3
districts counting a total of 14.
3 of 22 districts include instructional assistants with 3
districts counting a total of 5.
17 of 22 districts include resource teachers (special ed,
bilingual, etc.) with 9 districts counting a total of 20.
What is the philosophy statement of your English/language arts curriculum?
11 of 22 districts provided the information ranging from philosophy statements and program goals to complete curriculum guides. For sample statements, please send a written request to English/Language Arts Framework Project, AK DOE, 801 W. 10th Street, Suite 200, Juneau, AK 99801-1894.
The tables below show the degree to which the number of the 22 school districts' current English/language arts curriculum addresses the state student standards for English/Language Arts and the percentage of graduating seniors the district estimated would meet or exceed these standards.
How well are the standards addressed in curriculum? |
Graduating students meeting or exceeding the standards |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
very well |
|
|
not very well |
|
all |
76- 99% |
51- 75% |
26- 50% |
1- 25% |
none |
10 |
6 |
|
2 |
A. All Alaska students will speak and write well for a variety of purposes and audiences. |
|
11 |
3 |
1 |
|
1 |
12 |
7 |
2 |
2 |
B. All Alaska students will be competent and thoughtful readers, listeners, and viewers of literature, technical materials, and a variety of other information. |
|
8 |
8 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
9 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
C. All Alaska students will identify and select from multiple strategies in order to complete projects independently and cooperatively. |
1 |
8 |
4 |
7 |
2 |
1 |
11 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
D. All Alaska students will think logically and reflectively in order to present and explain positions, based on relevant and reliable information. |
|
5 |
7 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
8 |
9 |
2 |
2 |
E. All Alaska students will understand and respect other people's perspectives in order to communicate effectively. |
|
10 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
INSTRUCTION/ASSESSMENT (1) Items below addressed in district curriculum guides or other documents(2) Degree to which the districts have implemented each of these items (3) In the grid to the right, which language is used to implement each item |
![]() |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Language experience
in individual grades/schools 5 |
|
8 |
|
| 2. Elements of effective speaking
(ideas, organization, vocabulary, sentence fluency, style,
volume, intonation, clarity)
in individual grades/schools 2 |
|
8 |
|
| 3. Writing process instruction
in individual grades/schools 1 |
|
9 |
|
| 4. Elements of effective writing
(ideas, organization, word choice, sentence structure, voice,
and conventions of grammar, punctuation, capitalization,
spelling)
in individual grades/schools 3 |
|
8 |
|
| 5. Vocabulary development instruction
in individual grades/schools 2 |
|
8 |
|
| 6. Reading process instruction
limited use by individual teachers 1 |
|
8 |
|
| 7. Reading strategies instruction
limited use by individual teachers 1 |
|
8 |
|
| 8. Reading cueing systems
instruction
limited use by individual 3 |
|
6 |
|
| 9. Responses to literature
limited use by individual teachers 2 |
|
8 |
|
| 10. Using literature of diverse
historical and contemporary cultures
by individual teachers 3 |
|
8 |
|
| 11. Reading technical materials
no use 2 |
|
8 |
|
| 12. Listening skills/strategies
instruction
in individual grades/schools 4 |
|
8 |
|
| 13. Viewing skills/strategies
instruction (all but 1 of 22 school districts)
limited use by individual teachers 2 |
|
7 |
|
INSTRUCTION/ASSESSMENT (1) Items below addressed in district curriculum guides or other documents(2) Degree to which the districts have implemented each of these items (3) In the grid to the right, which language is used to implement each item |
![]() |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 14. Using projects in the classroom
limited use by individual teachers 1 |
|
8 |
|
| 15. Cooperative/collaborative
learning
limited use by individual teachers 1 |
|
9 |
|
| 16. Research skills instruction
limited use by individual teachers 1 |
|
8 |
|
| 17. Recognition of effects of points
of view, biases, stylistic differences among cultures
limited use by individual teachers 4 |
|
9 |
|
| 18. Thinking skills instruction
limited use by individual teachers 2 |
|
8 |
|
| 19. Instruction in stating and
defending a position
limited use by individual teachers 2 |
|
9 |
|
| 20. Use of electronic technology by
teachers and students: word processing
limited use by individual teachers 1 |
|
8 |
|
| 21. Use of electronic technology by
teachers and students: data management
limited use by individual teachers 4 |
|
9 |
|
| 22. Integrative language arts
approach
limited use by individual teachers 2 |
|
7 |
|
| 23. Use of interdisciplinary/thematic
units
no use 1 |
|
7 |
|
| 24. Performance Assessments: direct
writing assessment
no use 1 |
|
6 |
|
| 25. Performance Assessments:
portfolios
limited use by individual 6 |
|
7 |
|
| 26. Performance Assessments:
R.O.P.E.s/Senior Projects no use 5 |
|
4 |
|
| 27. Teacher research projects (all
but l of 22 school districts)
no use 1 |
|
6 |
|
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
On a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 indicating greatest need, please indicate your district's professional development needs in English/language arts for each of the following areas:
Return to Top of Page|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Developing content expertise: writing process |
3 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
|
Developing content expertise: reading process |
2 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
Developing content expertise: orally |
1 |
2 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
Developing content expertise: literature |
1 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Developing instructional skills |
|
3 |
3 |
6 |
|
Developing assessment skills |
|
2 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
Developing instructional materials |
3 |
|
5 |
2 |
2 |
Developing assessment materials |
1 |
|
3 |
|
8 |
Developing fluency with technology |
1 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
Developing skills for working with Limited English Proficient (LEP) students |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
Developing a climate for school change |
1 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
Please describe any innovative scheduling that your district has tried to increase time for professional development, i.e., a week of four long student contact days and one short day dedicated to professional development.
Please describe parent/community involvement activities in English/language arts, i.e., family literacy nights, community reading buddies.
Please describe two burning issues related to English/language arts in your district.
INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS
Return to Top of Pageintegrative language arts |
|||
| Primary | intermediate | middle / jr. . high | high school |
|
|
|
|
reading/literature |
|||
| Primary | intermediate | middle / jr. . high | high school |
|
|
|
|
writing |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
listening |
|||
|
|
|
|
viewing |
|||
|
|
|
|
ASSESSMENT STRATEGIES
| primary | intermediate | middle / jr.high | high school | |
performances and exhibitions |
|
|
|
|
complex tasks over time |
|
|
|
|
criterion - referenced tests |
|
|
|
|
norm-referenced tests |
|
|
|
|
Last modified on: Mon, Jun 17, 1996.